首页> 外文OA文献 >The conditional power of randomization tests for single-case effect sizes in designs with randomized treatment order: A Monte Carlo simulation study
【2h】

The conditional power of randomization tests for single-case effect sizes in designs with randomized treatment order: A Monte Carlo simulation study

机译:具有随机处理顺序的设计中单例效果大小的随机化检验的条件能力:蒙特卡洛模拟研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The conditional power (CP) of the randomization test (RT) was investigated in a simulation study in which three different single-case effect size (ES) measures were used as the test statistic: the mean difference (MD), the Percentage of Nonoverlapping Data (PND), and the Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP). Furthermore, we studied the effect of the experimental design on the RT’s CP for three different single-case designs with rapid treatment alternation: the completely randomized design (CRD), the randomized block design (RBD), and the restricted randomized alternation design (RRAD). As a third goal, we evaluated the CP of the RT for three types of simulated data: data generated from a standard normal distribution, data generated from a uniform distribution, and data generated from a first-order autoregressive Gaussian process. The results showed that the MD and NAP perform very similar in terms of CP whereas the PND performs substantially worse. Furthermore, the RRAD yielded marginally higher power in the RT, followed by the CRD and then the RBD. Finally, the power of the RT was almost unaffected by the type of simulated data. Based on the results of the simulation study, we recommend at least 20 measurement occasions for single-case designs with randomized treatment order that are to be evaluated with an RT using a 5% significance level. Furthermore, we do not recommend the use of the PND because of its low power in the RT.
机译:在模拟研究中研究了随机检验(RT)的条件功效(CP),其中使用三种不同的单例效应量(ES)量度作为检验统计量:平均差异(MD),非重叠百分比数据(PND)和所有对的非重叠(NAP)。此外,我们针对三种具有快速治疗交替的单例设计,研究了实验设计对RT CP的影响:完全随机设计(CRD),随机区组设计(RBD)和受限随机交替设计(RRAD) )。作为第三个目标,我们针对三种类型的模拟数据评估了RT的CP:从标准正态分布生成的数据,从均匀分布生成的数据以及从一阶自回归高斯过程生成的数据。结果表明,就CP而言,MD和NAP的表现非常相似,而PND的表现则差得多。此外,RRAD在RT中产生的功率略高,其次是CRD,然后是RBD。最后,RT的功能几乎不受模拟数据类型的影响。根据模拟研究的结果,对于具有随机治疗顺序的单例设计,我们建议至少20个测量时机,并使用5%显着性水平进行RT评估。此外,我们不建议使用PND,因为它在RT中功耗较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号